Via Email:

In the past, the roll of the church was to be to keep the people in line, confronting the evilness within the social fabric and country.  Today the separation of church and state keeps the church side lined, keeping the church from helping the sheep or having little correction of the issues effecting the day.  As a matter of truth—-the church should be confronted for the failing to be a guiding light to and for the sheep.

I want to quote a paragraph from Alexis de Tocqueville great works “Democracy in America” Vintage Books July 1990 Edition Vol. 1 pg.71

“It was never assumed in the United States that the citizens of a free country has a right to do whatever he pleases; on the contrary, more social obligations were there imposed upon him than anywhere else.  No idea was ever entertained of attacking the principle or contesting the rights of society; but the exercise of its authority was divided, in order that the office might be powerful and the officer insignificant, and that the community should be at once regulated and free.  In no country in the world does the law hold so absolute a language as in America: and in no country is the right of applying it vested in so many hands.  The administrative power in the United States present nothing either centralized or hierarchical in its constitution; this accounts for its passing unperceived.  The power exists, but its representative is nowhere to be seen.”

Page 70
“Nothing is more striking to a European traveler in the United States than the absence of what we term the government, or the administration.”

Today: The representative is everywhere seen as part of a ruling class & problem…part of the thing called big government.  Note what Tocqueville writes regarding “Social Obligations”.  Today rights are owed to everyone—-citizen or not—-with the citizen having absolutely no responsibility to anything or any person—-not even himself—all is protected or taken care of—-by the government—–with complete control of the person—through some government agency.

Note well there was never an idea entertained of attacking the principles or contesting the rights of society but the exercise of authority was divided and authority was divided so the office might have power and the officer insignificant.  Today—-these principles are being pushed further and further out of the way, being buried so as not to be found, nor are these principles used as any type of guide—–to guide a way out of the swamp of evil and sin— God has been rejected by the government and a large percentage of the populous.  Back in the early years of the country the power of the office and law existed but its representative was nowhere to be seen.

What a turn of events—-today almost everyone in politics is jockeying for his or her position, having and/or wanting their base of power and greed—–taking care of ono number1#—themselves.  The Republican Party, the Church and the social fabric have lost their way—-twisting what Tocqueville thought was an important element in the guiding of the citizens of early America.

I submit to you in the early years of America with its self-guidance—–the sin nature and the protecting of the peoples righteousness were kept in focus by the church with its Biblical teaching. This simple element of a church guiding the people was instrumental in keeping the culture in obedience to Gods law with His principles that would do everything in keeping the country and its people going in a righteous direction and on the correct path.

Today none of that is true.  We are heading in a direction and on paths of destruction with few understanding what Tocqueville was writing about—so I ask—–Will things change and what has happen?

We Shall See—Don’t you think?

We continue with “What Has Happened”—–(see link–part 1).  As you read it, I attempt to build a case showing our “Republic” is crumbling as Democracy with its mob rule takes charge.

Again I will be quoting extensively from Professor Gottfried Dietze, this time from his book “In Defense of Property” Published 1963.  Professor Dietze was professor of Political Science at John Hopkins University at the time the book was published.

There were many that said and thought the following——including Professor Dietze who said this——in his book

“Never in the history of mankind had a free nation risen so quickly to so eminent a position.”

What did happen?
He says this about the country (See below in bold) with his coming to the USA in 1949.  The concern about the direction of the country prompted his writing of “In Defense of Property”—with the research and publishing of the book in 1963, some 14 years after arriving here in America from Germany.

“Now, ten years later, I wondered whether a re-evaluation of this country was due.”

I would encourage you to find a copy of the book and read it because the little I am going to say about his thoughts and lessons from the book will not do it or him justice.

I quote:
“…, the study deals with the lawmakers in modern Western society, namely, with democratic government.  The manner in which the degeneration of democracy resulted in a disregard for property as well as the illegitimacy of that process will be discussed.  It will be revealed how property has been protected under higher law and legislation; how the latter originally conformed to higher law and reflected that law’s disposition in favor of a protection of property; how since the end of the nineteenth century democratic lawmakers rejected higher law to a greater and greater extent; how that rejection, combined with trends toward equality, resulted in a social outlook on property rights that led to infringement upon these rights.  The decline of property will thus be revealed as the result of the march of democracy.”

This short paragraph is a prelude to what the author has to say regarding his thoughts and lessons in the book.  His line of argumentation, I wish to suggest and widen with further deterioration of the culture he speaks of, as we raced into the 21st century (some 50+ years since the book was published) with “Equality and Political Correctness” completely in place—with a failure of the Church—Biblical Doctrine not being used to the point that it fails to make an impact on the culture and God’s Law is nowhere to be found.  The government being without God, the Educational System without God, and with Morals and Ethics failing miserably, not knowing the difference between “Equality, Fairness and Justice” as we refuse to use God’s Law.

This brings us full circle back to property rights and what happen to HB 76/ SB 76 (The School Property Tax Elimination Act that failed) here in Pennsylvania.  Without an understanding of where our property rights come from and those “Right’s” being protected under law and with a Democracy (rather than a Republic) that is geared to “Equality”—Progressivism with a Political Correctness, the situation was forced into a false righteousness of “Equality” that will always be unfair and unjust as a mode of government, having mob rule as the order in government—with little justice in the system.  All the while, those wanting the school tax monies based on property value, could care less if Families of the Middle Class and the Elderly on fixed incomes can meet those taxable expenses—all that thinking matter naught to the PC gang .

The argument of elimination of the School Property Tax never took on the right and wrong or the fairness of the issue or if school property taxation was even a just method of taxation—-those arguments never enter into the discussion.  The PC gang of both the legislators (the politicians) and the majority of the citizens who wanted the school giveaway problems—–now think in PC’s language, and who think in Progressive Attitude’s proper—- think that mode of thinking is right and have their ways and means Democratically in place, with a majority of people on that path, going in that direction, voting for school property taxation, keeping all programs as they are—–even as their positioning makes things worse for those of us who are trying to survive.

Justice and Fairness will disappear, as “Righteousness and God’s Law” disappears from the Culture/Political scene and a unrighteous Democratic mob rule takes grip of the civilization, God’s law and Goodness fades with the sunset and evilness comes on as darkness takes the place of light—-&—-we are forced to ask “What Has Happened?”.

We Shall See—Don’t you think?

The founding fathers had put together a form of government under a “Constitution” that—-up until that time—-was unheard of.  It has also been argued that the Magna Carta was the beginning, with that document focusing on property rights and/or the ability to own property at all levels of the civil structure.  With the Constitution we had what we would like to think was a Republic under law—with a control of government through a separation of powers in 3 different branches of government.  This Republic formed a control through “We the People” a democracy of control by the people and for the people with most powers proposed to pass from the Federal Government, down to the States.

States’ rights, nullification, and secession developed primarily from a profound conviction that an economic system and way of life of a minority were endangered by a political majority.  This idea was argued rather strongly with Madison recognizing the problem in the “Federalist #51”—–“If a majority be united by a common interest, the rights of the minority will be insecure.”  John C. Calhoun (1782-1850) argued the same point all his life—–in his “A Disquisition of Government” and many of his speeches—like “The Fort Hill Address” On the relations of the States and Federal Government July 26, 1831.

This is a brief couple of sentences on back ground so I can jump quickly to today and the Republican primary and what I think most—-if not “All” are missing when trying to say what is wrong with the scenario of Trump and the rest—I include the Democrats Clinton and Sanders.

These next couple of paragraphs will seem disjointed but hopefully it makes sense as you think on it, even as the political process, with its people change.

I will be quoting extensively from “Magna Carta and Property” (1965) Gottfried Dietze——I wish to give all credit to the author and his book for opening my eyes of thought and my understanding to what I think is the problem in today’s political arena.

The book Magna Carta and Property is short book—-having 83 pages and 183 foot notes.
I quote from two foot notes:

(Footnote 176—pg. 79) Mussolini was appointed Prime Minister by  the king on Oct. 30, 1922 and obtained a 306 to 116 vote of confidence in the Chamber of Deputies on Nov. 18.  A week later that Chamber granted him plenary powers by a vote of 275 to 90.”

(Footnote 178—pg. 79) Hitler was appointed Chancellor by President Hindenburg on Jan. 30, 1933.  He received plenary powers through the Enabling Act of March 24 by a vote of 441 to 94 with no votes being cast by 81 Communists and 26 Socialist who were in jail or in hiding.

Here is a few sentences of the closing section of “Concluding Remarks” which starts on page 74 finishing on 83. (see below)  These closing pages summarize what has happen to the Democratic process here in the USA.  You can see from the above footnotes that it appears both Mussolini and Hitler received power through a voting process—that voting process is about to take place here and it will be called a Democratic process.

Mr. Donald Trump has taken hold, as a phenomenon, that has made him out to be some kind of savior of the government and country—he is exactly what the people want to have or see come on to the scene—as shown by the reaction of the people.  I would suspect both Mussolini and Hitler were received in the Voting Chambers in the same fashion.  This consolidation of power by something that is so powerful (Alfa type personalities) it will dominate the arena and keep the citizens off balance and in the weeds of confusion as to what the real issues are.  It cannot be argued against—–that these figures on stage—–are dominating and have changed the focus of what is happening.  If the elements of “Why” and “What” is happening are changed—–into buzz words like “Liberty and Conservative” guiding the process and confusing the issue to the point that the process fails and/or it allows something to happen that has happen in past history.

I recommend you find a copy of Gottfried Dietze‘s Book “Magna Carta and Property”—–I did at the Bethlehem Library through inter-library own.

I quote below—read it carefully—keep in mind it was written in 1965—-some 50 years ago:

“The arrival of strong executives in democracies is not surprising.  Once sheer majority rule is admitted, the rule of a strong man controlling the majority cannot easily be prevented.  Often the majority may be a mere tool in his hands.  He will sway and wield its members as he see fit and force them into submission.  Although a leader may rise with the sanction, of the majority and head the drive against the minority, in the end he may whip the majority into line and drive its members into servility.  This development is quite natural.  Once the basic inviolability of the individual’s liberties has been questioned, a potential dictator can hardly be expected to respect the rights of those belonging to the majority.  He is like to do by majority as the majority under his leadership did by the minority.  Needless to say, at this stage democracy ceases…”

I leave you to ponder Professor Dietze’s words and ask the question—Are we asking the right question?  Are we on the right path?  Are we going in the right direction?

For those of you that know of the—–PA. School Property Tax Elimination Act  (HB 76–SB 76) and its failing let me ask this question—-Does not school property taxation violate the very essences and spirit of the Magna Carta—-it cut to the core of the home being man’s Castle and taxation should not be able to take ones home by government action under some law.

We Shall See—what the political process brings—don’t you think?


I am going back to what I wrote years ago and see if there is not some correction in direction or path we are now on or have come to.  The below (see link) is something I wrote and posted August 14, 2007—-today is February 3, 2016.

The question that needs answering is—Have we slipped further?  Is there a trend that we can see in these last 9—–10 years, since I wrote what I wrote? Is there anything showing us, we now have a handle on things and does the fact that more folks appear to be getting involved—will that make things different and/or better.

We have just had the Iowa Caucus vote—-with Ted Vruz winning.  I must ask myself—-are the people that voted February 1, 2016 any more righteous than those that took part in the vote of that 2007 in Iowa.  I have heard that the turn out vote in the Iowa caucus, the other day, was some kind of record.  Does more involvement by the people mean more concern in the direction, and if there is more involvement, will any of it, make a difference.

I will go on record as saying—-It will not and did not—the more folks involved will not straighten anything out.  As a matter of fact the more folks involved the more it seems to be getting more confusing with me hearing—–the candidates that are running—–are not revealing themselves, nor giving details of their plans.  Why is this?  Why are they appearing to bounce from one issue to another and never revealing how or why they take their stands.

Here we go—-my favorite pet peeve—-Standards—with Principles which never get talked about—-they (the politicians) will never talk about ethics and the morals of the issue.  Why are they taking that stand?  Where do they get their principles/standards that allow them to take that position?  What causes—what motive causes them to take that position if in fact they will not give some standard/principle that allows the move?

My thought on the lack of forcing Principles and Standards on to the table is——the people along with the politicians have no standard and refuse to get involved and entrapped with the possibility of them being ask what their standards are.  To take that direction and that path one step further—–we should—somebody should—-really force God’s Law on to the table because Reasoning with Logic as a standard is or has failed to resolve any of the conflict.  I suspect the “Constitution” will no longer resolve anything with or without a “Convention of the States”.

We have this from the 2007 article:
Thomas Jefferson spoke of “self-evident truth”

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, which among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”

Those words hold no life or justice—-“IF”—your standards and principles will not come or do not come from God—-So I suggest we bring God Laws and Bible out of moth balls placing them on the table and see if anyone wants to acknowledge those truths—-because—-if not we might as well turn out the lights and close up shop—-for we are done as a culture and country.  Finally, I don’t care how many come out to vote—-if they will not or cannot use God’s Law IE: the Bible to figure out paths or guide us in direction—putting us on “Biblical Paths” of reason with God’s logic—The culture is lost—the Country is lost.

We Shall See—-Don’t you think?

Nobody Cares

Nobody Cares—–is the reason why.

I have been asking for years now—How is it–the price of “Silver and Gold” is so depressed?   Well this 28 minute video (see link below) answers both that question of suppressed pricing in that market place—-Plus—-the reason we have what we have here in American——with the society/culture being on the wrong path and going in the direction.  All downhill with sin and evil growing at an alarming rate— with the outcome being——-“Nobody Cares”——-while most having it good—–not realizing the danger even as the sin and evil grow.   Nobody Cares or believes the problem is a religious one—as most are lost in the swamp of misdirection—-lacking much in the way of understanding.

The failure of HB/SB 76 “Pa. School Property Tax Elimination Act” has forced me to do more research on what the founders thought of property and the right to it.  James Madison took the position that the United States government was not a government that would violate the sacred rights of its citizens and that fact was shown to be—-as the other signers of the Constitution——pledged their sacred honor.  He formed his reason with the logic of—–if the United States was to be known for its wisdom and justice it would—–“respect the rights of property, and the property in rights.”—–so said and thought Madison.

This simple understanding of what “Ought be done” as it pertains to a man’s castle (his home) has slipped into the abyss of Political Correctness—with the (PC) of a Socialistic mind set—which is now bordering on a complete conquest—–with government heading into a tail spin of tyranny with some type of dictatorship on the horizon.

Tom Williams is—- Program Director for the Washington-Jefferson-Washington Institute—-in his article;  Conscience is the Most Sacred of Property: James Madison’s Essay on Property (March 22, 2013) William’s says this.

“The current administration shows either a willful ignorance or a remarkable disregard for Madison’s career-long defense of freedom of conscience to so openly and blatantly violate the property rights that Roman Catholics and other religious people have in their conscience.”

Note well his article was written well over 2 years ago and we have now an additional 2 years of slippage in the Constructional governing. This blatantly violation of property rights has destroyed the family and the Middle class is now on the brink of destruction ——as the PC gangsters had their way with abuse—–up and down the levels of government—from school boards to the Federal levels.  The school boards and school districts across the USA—and state to state governments—–violating their citizens as they continue to abuse them with a school property tax——and local government taxing the property which has the ability to take the citizen’s castle (Home)

If that person for whatever reason cannot pay the property tax—the property is foreclosed on to pay back tax.   If James Madison is right in his argument for property rights—-government and school districts have no right to place a tax on Man’s Castle.  That property is God’s property and He will give it to whomever He wishes and those folks should be thankful God bless them with it—government has no right to take their property.

The above words would be laugh at—-by most politicians—as they would call me a religious nut case—– who believes in the Bible as Western Civilization guide in the development of its law—with Jesus Christ as my savior.

BUT—WE SHALL SEE—What will happen—don’t you think???

1 Comment »

Separation of Church and State has been so twisted that we cannot get away from “Political Correctness (PC) which the “Frankfurt School of Germany”, put in place as they continues to push their PC agenda, even from the 30’s as they found a home here in the USA, escaping Hitler.  Traditionally, the role of the church was to confront a failing world with God, which included politicians and the government.  Today that is not so and the struggle of a remnant within the various denominations is to confront a failing church with God, as the PC clan dominates Washington DC and is about to take complete control.

The PC with its separation of church and state was the root cause which killed the Elimination of School Property Tax effort ——-Known as Pa. State House Bill 76 (HB76)—–the bill failed to come to the house floor as a stand-alone bill.  It then moved to the Pa. State Senate as Senate Bill (SB 76) where it was also defeated on the Senate floor by one vote.

Rather than going into a lengthy explanation of the deceit and perversion that occurred with the torpedoing of the bill I would like to attempt to explain the role of PC and the flaw in HB/SB 76 planning of its presentation and the lack of right elements being pushed in the legislation battle to get the bill past——those elements lacking—–caused the failure of 76.

The “Elimination of School Property Tax Bill” and the rolling out of the bill and information to be presented focused on the unfairness of the taxation on home owner, especially the home owner on fixed income—-this of course being right and just but the narrowing of the thrust of the battle plan was devastating in the final analysis——that move— eliminated a larger part of were the real effort should have been focused—-thus causing the failure.  The truth and justice behind the property rights fail to make it into the lime light—nor into explanation as to where the real truth of the bill’s morality and religious aspect of the effort should have been placed—–but it was not laid out nor focused on.

What “ought” to be done along with the deeper “Why” 76 should have been passed has a simple propositioned—that property and property rights are a gift from God to the people and the home should not be taxed by any government agency and if this is not enforced as that right to and for the citizens——it will lead to the destruction of society and its culture.

Micah 2:2;
“And they covet fields, and take them by violence: and houses, and take them away: so they oppress a man and his house, even a man and his heritage.”  

Isaiah 10:1;
“Woe unto them that decree unrighteous decrees, and write grievousness which they have prescribed;”

It was said of Winston Churchill that he understood man’s rights to property and that they were hinged directly to man being created in the image of God and because of this connection we have inalienable rights given to us and thus are stated as such in Western Civilization.  This simple known fact lead Churchill to stand against Hitler in England’s darkest hour.

James Madison wrote an essay on property in 1792 in which connects property rights to all human rights, including freedom of religion, speech and the press.

There has been a long tradition of understanding that, there is a connection with property rights to the right of conscience and religious liberty.  This position and possession of this knowledge regarding property rights and the nature of the citizen’s stand—–has been eroded—-with the perversion of Biblical doctrine and the twisting of the doctrine of Separation of Church and State.

This failure in the understanding of property rights—–lead to a lack of how to structure the push and legislative plan in putting forth the success of HB/SB 76.   The politicians have no idea they are working against God and that should have been told to them —–throughout the whole process of trying to get HB76 passed—-but you know  PC dictates we had to keep “Separation of Church and State” in place——-even if it meant going against God as the highest authority.

WE SHALL SEE—Don’t you think?????

I keep hearing of the dividing line being place in the Muslim Religion at or between the radical Muslim sometime call the “Terrorist” and the implication that the rest of the Muslims being given a pass as being the norm or moderate Muslim.  This to me is an indication people do not understand religious terms and do not understand the two terms “Theonomy” and/or “Theocracy”.

Theonomy—-in Greek—is made up of two words  Theo—God—-and—nomus—–Law.  The literal mean is the “Law of God” or “God’s Law”.

Theocracy—-God’s Rule or ruled by God.

Few have I heard deny or say that Islam and the Muslim Religion is “NOT” a theocratic rule under god—most will agree that the Muslim believes—–it is god’s law through the “Koran” under “Sharia Law” that they must live.   Which is a “Theocracy”.

If the above is true then the English speaking people have miss labeled the term Radical Islamist as being the odd ball and some kind of nut case—–which is false and totally miss leading—-He is not the radical (meaning odd to the extreme) but following a theocratic law of his god as laid out by his religion—being put forth in the Koran.

I would suggest we do not know God’s Law which is put forth in the Bible—The Atheist has thrown God and the Bible out of the government, the schools and the social order with the church’s not having a clue as to “Thus saidth the Lord”.  So we have one social circle knowing exactly what it wants to do with us—as per the Koran—–with this country being led by a president and political leaders that will not call on the God of the Bible—-not willing to offend the Muslim—- the Atheist—and the ACLU—-all the while the people here in America will forfeit there safety through an ignorance that is deadly.

I close with this——True “Theocracy” required a very limited church and state—-the founding fathers knew their Bibles—required little—knowing their responsibilities and knowing what they “Ought Do”.  Only for the righteous man does the word “ought do”—- have any real significance.

We Shall See—Don’t you think????


Ah yes, that word “vetting” keeps coming up lately! Vetting is just another word for “screening” which is nothing less than a background check of a particular person or persons before we allow them on our soil or to allow them to apply for a sensitive job.
Our government says, vetting is necessary for security when we allow people from other countries and cultures to come into our society, like the two that did the killings in San Bernardino last week. We also have the problem of vetting thousands of Syrian refugees that the president and his crew want to allow into our country against the wishes of most Americans and the Governors of many of our States. Malik was granted a special “fiancee” waiver so she would not have to undergo a security check. Most of us would not have allowed that but our president did.
The biggest mistake we have made in the past eight years is to not vet Barrack Hussein Obama before we allowed him to become our president or senator of Illinois. A simple test would be to look at his background and the people he has associated with. How about the “Weather Underground member” Bill Ayers? Then there was Bernadette Dorn and the Reverend Wright, Obama’s pastor. The mainstream news media wants us to believe Obama is a Christian! Why would we, at this point in time, believe anything the mainstream media tells us?
The only reason Obama was not vetted is because he is a Democrat, a liberal and Black. We must be politically correct, must we not? Even if it costs innocent human lives, we must allow the slaughter perpetrated on us by people that want us dead! If Obama was properly vetted, he would not be our president today. Please, (someone, anyone) give me a valid reason to believe Obama is not our enemy!

“On December 3rd—-Politico reported that while Obama is pushing for more gun laws when the cameras are rolling, behind the scenes aides say he has “essentially given up on any significant gun control.”….. “The aides stressed that the number of pro-gun members in Congress has only grown since the first big push for gun control following Sandy Hook. Because of this, the White House has “no strategy for dealing with Congress that leads to significantly tighter gun laws.”

They add insult to injury—do they truly think we—are—low information “FOOLS” to think we think any of the above is true.  Obama will never give up on his “Gun Control Progressive Atheist Marx moves”—–why it is one of the main tenants of the tyrants march to and toward complete power and control—–they can’t give that up—-it is an important element in their control.

He (Obama) has no idea that and because of the Muslim Islam terrorist threat he has brought to the forefront something that will now show and force Joe six pack to pay attention.  Why Joe might even pay attention to this——

Psalms 23:4—-“Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil, for you are with me; your rod and your staff, they comfort me.”

No folks—Obama and his merry band of “Elitist Progressives Atheist” along with the Terrorist just may have done the “Christians” a favor in showing them who is the God who is the “Higher Authority” and gives us our rights.
We Shall See—Don’t you think?

National Politics
| No Comments »

Older Posts »