Kathleen Willey has a new book out called: “Target: Caught in The Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton” Many would like to forget about “insignificant” people such as her and all the others like her. It’s just another story about how the Clintons intimidated people in an effort to keep them quiet. How can all the woman that came forward to accuse Bill Clinton of sexual molestation or rape, obesity be lying? Why would they lie? Weren’t they all Democrats? Didn’t they all work for him in one capacity or another? Article follows: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58533
Abraham Lincoln — “Gettysburg Address” November 19th. 1863. His last 18 words of that address say this:
John Wycliff (1329-1384) Translated the Latin Vulgate Bible into English (the Wycliff Bible) and gave the English speaking people its’ first English Bible. In it he wrote these words:
“This Bible is for the government, of the people, by the people, and for the people.”
When Wycliff and Lincoln penned those words they both understood what they meant. They thought of government, as something that had an absolute that it answered too. They also understood that the people had a responsibility to the same absolute authority.
We have lost this understanding of the absolute authority and the critical part it played in the binding together of the social fabric.
Both Church and State are under this absolute authority and it cannot be separated or done away with in the one or both. It does not matter that the Church’s primary concern is in the spiritual realm, while the State would be responsible for the social fabric and safety of society.
This absolute authority is God himself and His authority is given to us through His law word. The fact that the church has the added burden of caring for the peoples’ souls changes nothing as far as who is in charge or who’s law they fall under. Any attempt to do away with and/or change God law would be an offense to Him and to that law. Also any attempt to understand Western Civilization without God’s law is to falsify history.
We cannot have government of the people, by the people, and for the people, unless there is some common ground between those same people. The “OF”, “BY”, and “FOR” leaves no room for negotiations for anybody and there must be an absolute law. It will be God’s Law or some man’s law.
The understanding between the “Democrats” and “Republicans” has broken down, the D’s follow their law, while the R’s don’t know what they are following, and reasoning together is impossible and common ground is not to be found. We cannot stand if this situation lasts for any length of time, we must change and return to God’s Law.
Laws of any culture are religious in origin and they reflect the god of that culture. The Republicans will not acknowledge that, the Democrats cannot. If so—-“WE SHALL PERISH”
Psalms 9:20 King James
Put them in fear, O Lord: that the nations may know themselves to be but men.
For those of you that know me, erectile
you know my concerns go well beyond the simple analysis of these issues. You say the issues have simple answers and you need only develop the reasoning to convince your opponent, page
I say it is much bigger and goes much deeper in resolution of a more serious problem. I have consistently said that it is not the system that is broken but that the rules have been perverted and the standards lowered to were the system is being used against itself and the people of this land.
Politics have gone from debate, reasoning, and resolution of the issues, to greed, pork for the district, and power of position. The truth of that statement cannot be denied, but the peculiarity of that situation is that none of the guilty admits to this guilt nor will they acknowledge in perverting the rules and system. Who is guilty and who is not becomes and/or adds to the chaos and confusion of the situation. This chaos and confusion has deteriorated to blindness of purpose and not understanding the truth of the situation.
We have lost our way to such an extent that we no longer recognize what liberty is and the fact that we have lost it. And worse through a forced political correctness we cannot get that liberty back. Why is this? Because we cannot openly say what our conscience is telling us, we have in effect lost our “Liberty of Conscience”. If that is true we have lost something that only God has dictate over and we have given it away. When loosing your conscience it will never go to a good man, but to evil men or Satan himself. The evil then becomes good men doing nothing and/or can’t do anything.
Psalm 11:3 King James “If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?”
The concept of “Liberty of Conscience” was of great concern to our founding fathers. So much so that the House of Representatives on August 20,1789 voted to approve an amendment and I quote only the last 7 words.
“…or to infringe the rights of conscience.”
These 7 words were deleted from the adopted 1st. Amendment December 15,1791. This Amendment we know only to well.
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,…”
No were in the 1st. amendment does it mention the rights of “Conscience”, and that this liberty is sacred and is something between man and his God. Either God will control mans’ conscience or man will turn it over to Satan. Have we not lost our conscience collectively or are we real close, maybe we have already lost something called “Liberty of Conscience”.