Hope the Fathers are Happy?
Jun 19th, 2009 by Randy Toman
The Constitution is no longer viewed as something that will protect the people against a tyrannical government. Since the civil war the progressive movement has continually subvert the constitution, it’s meaning and its power, all the while substituting Socialistic agendas as government programs. Once the essence of the constitution has been changed the government steps in to take its place. We have eliminated the sovereignty of the people and replaced it with greedy, powerful and corrupt individuals who are now running our government.
“American had exhibited to the world constitutions in which the people exercised their sovereign authority to create governments that rested specifically on the people’s “Consent” at an identifiable moment of history and not on a long growth of authority and precedent.”
“View of the Constitution of the United States” St. George Tucker Foreword, Clyde N. Wilson—-Liberty Fund 1999
We the people have lost the treasures of the “Constitution” and essences of the word “consent”. When was the last time we consented to what the politicians did? Is it not true that laws and dictates are made without any thought to get approval from the citizens.
We the people have lost the essence of who is to “tolerate” whom. We must tolerate all the nonsense, insanity, spending, and evilness coming from our politicians, all the while our government says they will tolerate our troops coming home but brand them as someone to be watched for possible terrorist acts if they have a bumper sticker and/or say something not falling within government divides of their definition of “toleration”. How is this possible?
The understanding of the “Constitution” must be re-learned through the eyes of St. George Tucker (1752-1827). The government were delegates rather then masters of the people, they governed within the guide lines of the law which was understood through our “Constitution”. St. George Tucker took Blackstone’s Commentaries of English law and Americanized and Republicanized them so that they would fit within the frame work of what the Constitution stood for, because Blackstone’s commentaries were suffused with the principles of a monarchial and aristocratic state. Tucker’s revised and Americanized, Blackstone’s commentaries were published in Philadelphia in 1803 and were widely used up to the civil war. “Consent” and “Toleration” given by the people had only one direction in which authority could flow and that was from the people. The authority from the people was hinged on God’s law, for the people knew from were their liberty and freedom came, and it was not from the king and/or some government.
Under “Constitutional” law we the people grant, “Consent” not the other way around. We have lost all meaning of what the constitution means. We argue over the 2nd. Amendment, free speech, all the while the government tolerates us and dictates laws that suppress us. They should all be impeached, we gave no “Consent” to leave our borders wide open. We gave no “Consent” to loan our money to the banks and the Federal Reserve System is UN-CONSTITUTIONAL and the politician are debating as to whether or not they can audit the FED. Why they should be tarred and feathered, all of them, what is wrong with us? I tell you we have no knowledge of what our founding fathers tried to teach us. HAPPY FATHERS DAY—-WE SHALL SEE what next father’s day will bring.
