Too Many People
Jan 26th, 2009 by The Outsider
Our good friend, Democrat house speaker, Nancy Pelosi, seems to think there are too many people being born in the United States. Her solution: birth control, payed for by the taxpayers to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars. She claims this will reduce government expense and stimulate the economy. Isn’t it her and the democrats that want to give more and more entitlements to the same people she thinks shouldn’t be born? Hypocracy? Of course it is! Where are most abortion clinics? Very close to the predominately African American communities. About 40% of all abortions are African American and yet over 90% of African Americans voted for Obama and the Democrats. Insane, isn’t it? There is something very wrong here! Some statistics:
http://www.abortionfacts.com/learn/blacks_and_abortion.asp
Read the article on Nancy Pelosi’s statement to George Stephanopoulos during his interview on ABC.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=87161
There’s nothing “conservative” about being anti-abort. Anti-aborts don’t regard their enemies as human; we feel the same about them.
So much for the “sacredness of human life.” “Hypocracy”? There’s plenty of hypocrisy to go around.
How many liberals are pro-life versus conservatives? Every conservative I know considers all people as being “human”; liberals and conservatives, including the unborn. As for enemies, the biggest enemies to the unborn are the liberal politicians which you no doubt support. You said you don’t consider conservatives as being human, is that right? If we don’t have the right to be born, than we have no rights at all!
Being anti-abort is being anti-woman. Does a woman qualify as human or is she seen as some kind of sub-human liberal? You people love to call those you hate liberal and then tell yourselves how great you are. Anything goes against a liberal. We have heard this from Limbaugh and the rest of those types since 1988: de-humanizing liberals is what they do, from William Bennett to Michael Savage.
The fact is you conserves are nothing but glorified “humanists” and a humanist is nothing but an immigrant-loving liberal. And that’s what Reagan was: an amnesty provider, the one who opened the borders.
“Being anti-abort is being anti-woman.” No! Being anti-abort is to be pro-life for the unborn. How you interpret that to be anti-woman is beyond me!
“Does a woman qualify as human or is she seen as some kind of sub-human liberal”
I consider all people (liberal and conservative), to be human, even the unborn as I said in my previous comment. I also hate no one and I am not “you people”!
“The fact is you conserves are nothing but glorified “humanists” and a humanist is nothing but an immigrant-loving liberal. And that’s what Reagan was: an amnesty provider, the one who opened the borders.”
I’m sorry, but I just don’t understand your rationalization. I think we are just wasting our time. You probably won’t ever understand Christian conservatives and personally, I don’t care! So be it!