<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We don&#8217;t need Who?</title>
	<link>http://www.lehighvalleyconservative.com/we-dont-need-who/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur Parisi</title>
		<link>http://www.lehighvalleyconservative.com/we-dont-need-who/#comment-497</link>
		<author>Arthur Parisi</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lehighvalleyconservative.com/we-dont-need-who/#comment-497</guid>
		<description>I have two questions.

First: Are you advocating a theocracy?  It sounds like you believe that a government based heavily (or solely) on scripture would be best.  And if you are, then...

Second: You speak of tyranny as a byproduct of a godless government.  How do you respond to the idea that non-Christian citizens of a Christian theocracy would probably feel more tyrannized (whether intentional or not) than if the government were not religiously-affiliated at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have two questions.</p>
<p>First: Are you advocating a theocracy?  It sounds like you believe that a government based heavily (or solely) on scripture would be best.  And if you are, then&#8230;</p>
<p>Second: You speak of tyranny as a byproduct of a godless government.  How do you respond to the idea that non-Christian citizens of a Christian theocracy would probably feel more tyrannized (whether intentional or not) than if the government were not religiously-affiliated at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
